Monday, December 19, 2011

Advent Love


Psalm;  Luke
Fourth Sunday of Advent:  December 18, 2011

The angel Gabriel coming to Mary to tell her she will bear a son is one of those stories we all know as a part of the larger, beautiful story of the first Christmas.  Mary, the willing servant of God, becomes the mother of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.  We love Mary: images of her in the stable, with the baby Jesus, make us feel warm and cozy and make us want to sing Silent Night. 

Given that, I realize that when I deconstruct a passage like this one, I risk taking some of the “magic” out of Christmas for folks.  I can tell you I don’t do so lightly; this is, in some ways, a very hard sermon to preach.  But I am going to take the risk for the sake of freeing this story from the past, so that it might inform our faith as we live as Christians in the world today.  That’s your fair warning – but if you hang in there with me, I promise we’ll get to the good stuff…because I do think this is a story full of gospel truth, and one that leads us beautifully into Christmas. 

There are two fundamental problems at work in this story of the annunciation, as it is called.  The first problem is with the author, and the second problem is with us…the readers. 

The problem with the author is that he was a human being – affected by his culture and setting – just as we all are.  This is not something he could fix, nor should we have an expectation that it could have been otherwise.  But he was human, and the images and metaphors used in this story were conceived at a time when views on women and what their role was were – well, let’s just say they were not exactly enlightened by our standards. 

Throughout the bible – written mostly by men – women, with scant few exceptions, are portrayed as being valuable solely for their ability to produce sons.  And worse, when we read these stories, we see that the men didn’t believe women had, or should have had, any say in their role in reproduction.  Most of the time, as these authors tell it, God comes in and announces to a woman she’s going to have a child, whether she likes it or not.

In the case of our passage today, not only does God, through the angel, announce that Mary will have a child, but the way in which she will conceive, and the images the author uses to describe this conception, is problematic for many women – specifically for some women who have experienced sexual abuse.  The images of the Holy Spirit overpowering Mary’s body in order to impregnate her are based in a culture that had little or no sensitivity to issues surrounding abused women.

I know this is not something we want to think about…but we don’t live in the same culture as the authors, and we do have a choice about whether to be sensitive to such things.  And knowing that at least 1 in 6 women have experienced such abuse, we would do well to choose sensitivity – at least in the form of rejecting this particular image as revelatory of the God of love who stands with the abused – not in power over them. 

We hear this story year after year, and I know for a fact it stirs up terrible feelings and memories for some women…so if we are going to read it here in this space – this sanctuary that is supposed to be safe and life-giving – we need to acknowledge this and say out loud that in this space we reject such images for God…we reject a God that would ever employ such tactics.

Does that mean we need to reject this story entirely?  I struggle with this.  There is much in the bible that is colored by biases, prejudices, and misconceptions based on the culture of the time.  But it’s anachronistic to blame the authors for this, and it’s also a mistake to assume they have nothing profound to say just because they were creatures of their culture.  These are inspired people of faith, and they are exceptional writers, human though they are. 

If we’re careful and if we do acknowledge those places where human frailty slips in, I think instead of rejecting the whole shebang, we are best off re-imagining these stories for today, rejecting the parts that are bound by that culture and embracing the truths these authors were trying to proclaim.  And of course we do so knowing we are bound by our culture and limitations and biases, and faithful people in the future will have to re-imagine the story for their day, shedding the images steeped in our cultural prejudices. 

But, the bottom line for me is there is something core in this story that can be meaningful for us if we reject the images some fine painful, and re-imagine something life-giving.

Which leads us to our second problem:  us.  The author was trying to describe an experience and understanding of God, and to do so he used metaphor.  As I have said before, sometimes only metaphor will do when speaking of the divine, because we are trying to point to something that transcends us, transcends our language and experiences – and that is a job for metaphor.  Think of all the metaphors the authors of our scriptures use to try to describe who Jesus was relative to God:  Lamb of God; Word of God.  Obviously, the author didn’t think Jesus was a barn animal with four legs.  These are metaphors.  And “Son of God” is one more metaphor meant to say something about Jesus, but doesn’t literally mean he is God’s biological child.  And the virgin birth is a metaphor meant to point to a truth about our relationship with God, not to make a declaration about a biological fact.

We make the mistake of trying to read this story as if the author meant it literally or as an historical account.  And so we get caught up in the virgin birth, whether such a thing happened, whether such a thing is a miracle.  We get caught up in thinking of Mary as Jesus’ mother and God as Jesus’ father as if they form a nuclear family of sorts.  And then we try to figure out who Joseph is in all that.

This literalizing of the story creates all kinds of problems.  For some it’s been emblematic of why they reject the faith altogether, knowing a virgin birth is not literally possible and so they can’t participate in a religion that would claim otherwise.  For others it has led to a faith in a magical God that points a finger and makes miraculous things happen, which creates problems in thinking about how God moves and acts in our world today.

In addition, I think to understand this story literally confines the truth of it in people who lived 2000 years ago, and so we miss entirely what it might say for us today.  We make Mary into an idol – the one and only chosen for this miraculous act…unique because she was able to conceive a child without ever having sex.  We make the birth of Jesus into an extraordinary, supernatural event that happened 2000 years ago – something that has never happened since.  In doing so, we forget that, in part, these characters are stand-ins, symbols, for other things – they transcend their time, and the symbols point to universal truths, not just particular events.

So if we let go of culturally limited metaphors and a literal reading of this story, we’re prepared to look for its core meaning or message.  This is where it gets good. J  This is where we see it’s not just about an extraordinary event in the past, but about extraordinary possibilities today.

Let’s begin with what the angel says to Mary.  The first thing the angel says is “Greetings favored one – Yahweh is with you.”  Mary, we’re told, pondered what sort of greeting this might be because she was perplexed – so I decided to ponder it a bit myself.

I spent some time this week with this word – the word “favored.”  As I looked at the Greek, it seemed clear to me that this does not mean that Mary was more special than everyone around her, and that is why God “chose” her.  A better, if more awkward, translation would be to say, “Greetings one whom God has made grace-filled, lovely, and blessed.”  In other words, God has made Mary beloved.  And we know, from looking at all of scriptures, this is something God has done for all of human kind.  Our baptism in Christ clothes us with the character and nature of Christ, the one about whom God said, “This is my child, my beloved.”  This greeting to Mary is God’s greeting to us – all of us, even the most lowly, poor, broken, and lost.

This event begins – is entirely rooted in – love: the love between God and human kind.  And when we start with this love, our passage tells us, miraculous things are born.  This is why the author had to make God the partner of Mary in all this.  This is divine-human love, not just the love between two human beings.  This is a story about connection with something in the universe that by its very nature moves toward goodness, justice, and peace.  And that connection, initiated by God and embraced by us, is the beginning of the story of our faith.

When we begin with this love…when we connect with the divine, something is born among us that is pure, unbridled, possibility.  This is what we see in Jesus.  Jesus, the product of divine-human love, was both pure possibility and the model of how humans can make this possibility a reality.  Through love, something emerges in our world that is the seed of the Realm of God…and if we nurture the seed, tend to the possibilities, participate in its growth, this Realm will become real all around us.  Today. 

So how do we connect with that love?  This is where we need new images and metaphors.  And they don’t come easy when talking about something that is just beyond our imagination.  And we’re as susceptible to limitation and cultural constraint as the gospel writer was.  But if we can re-imagine that Holy Spirit not as the divine one overpowering us – overshadowing us – but as inviting us, I think we have a good start.  We do, like Mary, have to consent to participating in God’s love…we have to respond in faith; we say with Mary, “Here I am.”  But we are compelled to do this not by the force of the spirit, but rather by the allure of love…pure love, which is gentle, kind, forgiving, transforming, hopeful, and just…and inviting. 

The holy spirit – divine love – invites us to participate in the movement of the spirit.  And when we do, possibilities are born.  More is waiting to be born.  That’s the message of Advent.  And in this coming week, when we celebrate and remember Jesus’ birth – let’s remember where it began:  In divine-human connection and love.  May Christmas this year be an invitation to you to participate in that love that Christ might be born again and again in our midst.  Amen.